New member with a few questions... pt 2 of 6
PART 2 of 6
Instead you appear to have gone down a wholly inappropriate road for someone who was originally given a degree of responsibility in ensuring that this forum continues to function smoothly.
While WebRing.com personnel remain to hold stead fast to their shallow belief that *they* are always right, that *they can and do say anything *they* like, there will always be uneasiness. There will always be double standards and there will always be flexing of the proverbial muscle by *them*. None of which is helpful in building the very thing you profess to be doing.
Ever wonder why I stopped donating?
Ever wonder why I do not get as involved as I use to?
Posts appear in public forum/s by WebRing.com personnel which clearly should not have. Without doubt they should have been of a private nature. An example which involved me can be read here:
What was the purpose of such a post! That post is absolutely disgusting and should have been a private message to seek clarification rather then the innuendos, guessing, thinking out loud, speculating. . .
Svetlana Sally Johnston
Hey, but please call me Sally J :-)
"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock." - Will Rogers
Australian National Tail Injury Database
Sick of Spam? Fight back with MailWasherPro